Complaint Against Michael Ioane Dismissed by Judge

A complaint filed against Michael Scott Ioane by the U.S. Postal Service was dismissed by the Honorable Judge Jeremy Fogle of the San Jose Federal District Court (Case #C96-21008JF, July 2, 1998).

Subsequent to the dismissal with prejudice, however, the administrative office of the USPS ignored the decision and has issued an order in contempt of Judge Fogle's ruling. Is this a deliberate display of vindictiveness towards Mike Ioane because a higher level judge issued the order in his favor? Or did the USPS simply choose to overlook the ruling?

Honorable Judge Robert A. Wherry, Jr. Retaliates Against Michael Ioane by Issuing Bizarre Order

In answer to the T.C. Memo. 2009-68 UNITED STATES TAX COURT MICHAEL SCOTT *IOANE*, filed March 26, 2009, the truth is this order was issued without evidence or merit in retaliation for Mike Ioane's publicizing of IRS wrongdoings.

During the proceedings, Mike Ioane brought up the issue that the IRS failed to properly promegate the tax table, as mandated by Congress in 1993. Upon hearing this, Judge Wherry went on a rampage, directing the court reporter to ignore the statement, and ordered Mr. Ioane to cease any further statements about it.

The truth is in 1993 Congress mandated, pursuant to Internal Revenue Code 1F, that the IRS shall prescribe certain tax tables in accordance with various inflation and consumer price indexes. In this instance, the IRS failed to comply with standards set by Congress.

If the IRS was to retroactively comply, the consequences would result in hundreds of billions of dollars in refunds to American taxpayers.

In response to the above tax court document, Mike states:

This is merely a retaliation for my making public the Ninth Circuit opinion that the IRS committed fraud, a case in which the US Tax Court was overruled. After all these threats, harrassments and attempts to interfere in my lawful business activities by the IRS, I wonder what reward the Lord has waiting for me. Every time these folks do something illegal to harass me it seems there is something much more rewarding waiting . . maybe it is to allow me the opportunity to expose the criminal activity on the part of the IRS and the Justice Department.

Mike Ioane has three successful civil litigations pending against the IRS totalling in excess of $3 million.

In an effort to wake taxpayers up to the abuses and irregularities of the US Tax Court, Mike will continue to make public the contradictions in evidence in the T.C. matter. Return to this blog for updates, or visit www.truthinlaw.org.

Michael Ioane - Prosecutor Lies to Grand Jury, Obtains Dirty Indictment

In answer to the tax evasion allegations against Michael Scott Ioane, the truth is the grand jury was lied to by prosecutor Mark Culliers.

The real reason behind the indictment is that Mr. Ioane has three successful civil litigations pending against the IRS totalling in excess of $3 million. This is simply another retaliation against Mr. Ioane for his history of exposing injustices by the IRS.

Mike Ioane is being represented by Anthony Cappozzi of Fresno, CA.

Bigamy

Bigamy

Bigamy
("bi-") two
("-gamy") marriages.

Bigamy is the actual legal term used in law. The legal "offense" of bigamy is defined as being when a person has obtained "legally recognized" marriages to more than one living mate at the same time.

The root-word, "bi", in the word, bigamy, refers to two. But it does not mean only two mates. A bigamist is NOT simply a polygamist with only two mates.

Rather, bigamy, in terms of law, refers to any additional and secondary would-be "legally recognized" marriage which comes after the only, first, government-allowed, one "legally recognized" marriage. This is reflective of the "thinking" behind the (anti-polygamy) bigamy laws.

When someone has obtained more than one would-be "legally recognized" marriage, each additional would-be "legally recognized" marriage is deemed as "secondary" to the only one government-allowed "legally recognized" marriage.

Hence, any third, fourth, fifth, etc. would-be "legally recognized" marriages would all individually be deemed as separate "secondary" so-called "legally recognized" marriages. (The second would be deemed as "secondary", the third would be "secondary", the fourth would also be "secondary", and so would the fifth, etc.)

That's how the "bi", meaning "two", comes into the meaning of "bigamy" here. It is the government's perception of "secondary" in these matters which makes the definition.

Accordingly, a single count of "bigamy" is charged against an accused bigamist for each "secondary" would-be "legally recognized" marriage ---one charge each for each additional "legally recognized" marriage beyond the "first" and government-allowed "legally recognized" marriage.

For example, a man with three would-be "legally recognized" wives would be charged with TWO counts of bigamy. This would be due to the "second wife" being considered as one "secondary" wife and the "third wife" being considered as a second "secondary" wife. This would be all due to the government's perspective that there can be no more than one government-allowed "legally recognized" wife at the same time.

The difference, then, between a polygamist and a bigamist is NOT the number of mates. The meaning of bigamy and its application in (anti-polygamy) bigamy laws shows that its meaning is about any number of multiple "secondary" would-be "legally recognized" marriages after the "first" would-be "legally recognized" marriage.

Thus again, bigamy does NOT mean simply a "polygamist with only two mates". Bigamy is the actual term used in law, pertaining to the act of obtaining any number of "secondary" would-be "legally recognized" marriages beyond the "first" government-allowed one, at the same time.

With that understood, there are then actually two distinctly separate classifications of accused "bigamists".

• Dishonest Bigamists - Accused of bigamy for turning secret affairs into secret "secondary" would-be "legally recognized" marriages beyond the "first" government-allowed one, at the same time,
  and being DISHONEST, as their other mates do not know of each other .
  
  and
• Honest Polygamists - Accused of bigamy for obtaining any "secondary" would-be "legally recognized" marriages beyond the "first" government-allowed one, at the same time,
  yet being HONEST, with all the family knowing of each other .

Truly, the matter of "Dishonest Bigamy" is certainly in a separate classification by itself. The deceitfulness of such a situation has nothing to do with the true marriage matters of bona fide polygamy.

And the matter of "Honest Polygamy" does not become a basis for being accused of bigamy if one does not obtain any secondary "legally recognized" marriages .

So, here again, it is clear that being a "bigamist" does not automatically mean that one is a bona fide "polygamist". And vice versa. The two words clearly have separate meanings.

In the final analysis, therefore, as long as an "Honest Polygamist" does not obtain any form of "legally recognized" marriage with any mate after the first "legally recognized" marriage, then no law in these modern times has been broken and the polygamist is NOT a bigamist at all.

Since most polygamists thereby never commit the actually legally-defined "offense" of bigamy because they do NOT seek any such "legally recognized" marriages anyway (beyond the first one, if at all), then no (anti-polygamy) bigamy law in these modern times is being broken by such polygamists anyway.

NOTE: The contents of this page may not be used or miscontrued as "legal advice" in replace of consulting with one's own attorney in one's own jurisdiction.

Written by Christian Polygamy INFO ^TM

Attorney Michael Minns Beats IRS, Again

SEATTLE , Washington – Two innocent and patriotic citizens’ dodge 64 IRS lethal bullets in a triumph for justice and the American way.

Continue reading...

Attorney Tom Cryer, aquitted of tax charges 07/11/07

Attorney Tom Cryer acquitted of willful failure to file income tax returns; because no law exists requiring the average American to file an income tax return or pay a tax on his/her labor.

Continue reading...

I.R.S. Charged with Fraud

Ninth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals

Attorney's for the I.R.S. commit Fraud upon the court. I.R.S. must pay back $400,000,000 in bogus charges. Decision January 17, 2003, "Dixon vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue." Case No. 00-70858.

Continue Reading...